September 22-27, 2009 - Washington, DC

The Sonic Circuits Festival of Experimental Music was initiated by the American Composers Forum (ACF) to provide DC's music and art communities with the opportunity to sample experimental and avant-garde electronic music, with an emphasis on improvisation and artistic use of new technologies.

Now heading into its ninth year, the Washington DC chapter of the ACF has expanded the scope of the festival to include electro-acoustic compositions, free jazz, noise rock, electronic drone and experimental folk, as well as live video and film programs, presented year round.

Sonic Circuits seeks to foster the spirit of collaboration through the diversity of participating artists, and its varied programming appeals to arts enthusiasts of all types.

Posts Tagged ‘artist spotlight’

Artist Spotlight: The New Ghent School of Electronica

Tuesday, September 16th, 2008

Odradek is a Ghent, Belgium-based organization dedicated to sound art, experimental and electronic music. They host regular sound art exhibitions and concerts by renowned and emerging electronic musicians and composers. Odradek also aims to stimulate and promote exciting new work by young Belgian sound artists. For Sonic Circuits, Odradek selected three graduates from the Experimental Arts studio of the Ghent Art College. All three artists work primarily with sound in installations and performances.

Mieke Lambrigts

Mieke Lambrigts has been working steadily on a series of sound interventions tailored to specific locations. With little more than field recordings and sine waves she weaves subtle soundtracks that almost completely blend into the room ambience and resonance of the spaces in which they are performed. Very discreet music that is always on the verge of disappearing.

Pauwel De Buck utilizes location recordings of surplus sound materials from the urban environment. His composition methods are as much time-based as they are sculptural and spatial. The resulting works traverse between concrete sound environments and abstract aural spaces.

Jeroen Vandesande takes a highly explorative approach to sound and composition. His works combine avant-garde compositional methods such as game theory and chance operations with contemporary DIY techniques like no-input mixing, chaotic feedback systems and guitar drones.

jeroen Vandesande

Among his pieces are audiovisual installations, solo improvisations and works for multiple performers.

Sonic Circuits asked Han Van Den Hoof, director and curator for Odradek, a few questions about the new sounds coming out of Ghent.

You once mentioned that these 3 individuals form part of the “new Ghent school of electronica.” Does Ghent have a tradition of electronic music, and a unique style or approach to sound art? If so who are the pioneers? Or is this just a throw away term created by local media?

To a degree it’s really little more than an easy catchphrase, but there certainly is a tradition of electronic music in this town. The IPEM (Institute for Psycho-Acoustics and Electronic Music) was one of the first electronic studios in Belgium. During the 70s and 80s a lot of electronic work by international composers was developed there.

To call the current resurgence of electronic music a “school” would be an exaggeration, though. There is no particular “Ghent style” of electronic music It’s mainly a group of people who become interested in similar things at a given point in time and create a fertile atmosphere for exchange of ideas and interesting new music or art.

How would you characterize the work coming out of Experimental Arts studio at the Ghent Art College?

Pauwel de Buck

The output of the Experimental Arts studio isn’t easily classifiable. Otherwise it wouldn’t really be “experimental”, right? But there is an emphasis on performance art, installations, video and sound art.

Many people have never encountered sound art in a performance setting and it can be confusing or intimidating. Do you have any suggestions for the first time listener on how to approach such music?

As an audience member, one should keep an open mind and retain a willingness to listen. In that respect it’s no different from any other form of experimental music or art. The more you’re willing to submit yourself to it, the greater the reward could be.

Mieke Lambrigts and Jeroen Vandesande perform September 29 and Pauwel De Buck September 30 at Pyramid Atlantic.

Artist Spotlight: Dead Letters Spell Out Dead Words

Monday, September 8th, 2008

Sweden’s Dead Letters Spell Out Dead Words is the specter that haunts Thomas Ekelund. But it is a ghost by which Ekelund performs sonic exorcism, unleashing his bleak and twisted vision into the material world. Culling found sounds from his habitat, twisting in inspiration from 60’s girl groups, and molding it together with the last gasps of vinyl noise, Dead Letters Spell Out Dead Words gives birth to what one might name concrete drone pop.

While it might not be »musical«, the sound is emotionally charged. From bleak to bleaker, grimy sounds emanate from the sewer, while rays of hope sneak through the broken glass, reflecting on the blood stained shards on the street above.

Ekelund has released music under various guises since 1999, including Normal Music and Dead Violets, (with J. Surak) Dead+Hurt and WNQST//LNDGRN (with J. Lindgren), Winquist/Virtanen (together with R. Abrehamsson) and many many more ranging from pure noise to shoegazing guitar ambient.

Mr. Ekelund took time out to answer a few questions about his creative process:

OK, so why 60’s girl groups? Is it because they contain those heavy dense production values akin to drone & shoegaze, or are they emblems of repressed desire and longing for sexual release? Or an ideal manifestation of the two that makes them so attractive? Or simply fucking good music?

I could answer yes on all three, if I want to keep things simple. But things are rarely simple.
1) Girl Groups in general, and The Ronettes in particular can be seen as a symbol of desire. In an allegorical sense I suppose they can even be viewed as sexual. To me they represent the need for closeness, longing for some sort of reason, yearning for a touch, all the basic human needs that are oh so hard to fulfill.
2) Sonically the production values of Phil Spector resemble what I try to do very much. There are all these layers going on, and each of them might seem entirely expendable but when they add up the create and overpowering wave of emotions.
3) It sounds good. I make music and music isn’t worth anything if it isn’t listenable.

Your work can easily be organized into three approaches: concrete, drone, and pop. When working on new material do you consciously decide from the start to work in one of those directions, or do you leave it open to chance?

Basically chance, or maybe anti-chance. I’ve realized that regardless of what I set out to create, it almost always mutates into the opposite. So these days I try to never force anything. Concrete, drone, pop, they are all entwined and of equal importance.

Even when its a sunny day and you’re out gathering field recordings, do you actively search for the smaller, bleaker, mysterious sounds that surround you, or do they find you?

I have never consciously sought out bleakness, it just comes out that way when I compose. The same thing goes for field recordings. There’s nothing inherently bleak or dark in the hum of a fan or a washing machine, but if you put them in that kind of a context they will appear as such.

Visual presentation is an important part of your releases and performances. Are they created in tandem with the music, or afterwards? Have you ever created music to fit a visual concept? One can hear the visual nature of your concrete works, as they are highly suggestive and conjure up various visions and landscapes.

I find it increasingly hard to separate the two, but I can’t remember any case of having a clear image that I have tried to fit the music to. But since almost all my thoughts are images I suppose you could say that I do it all the time.

The visual representation is still an integral part of what I do, and I have done a handful or things under the Dead Letters banner that’s been purely visual, and there’s bound to be more in the future.

Explain what was the impetus to make like your live performances from straight presentations of your work into becoming more ritualistic in nature. Was this a conscious decision or did it just happen over time? What was your inspiration?

I was preparing for a regular live gig a few years ago and then every aspect of that first ritual just appeared in my head and I knew that I couldn’t ignore it. And it’s been like that every time: a clear and fully formed series of actions and objects that should be performed at a specific place or at a specific point in time for a specific reason. It’s a way of focusing energy, of forming seals and destroying circles.

I suppose the need to ritualize things we do not understand is universal in humans. That’s why religion is part of every culture on earth. Our crude, primitive minds look for patterns, tries to make sense of things by what ever means we have at our disposal. Some people are content with mimicking other peoples liturgies, but personally I believe that you have to construct your own rituals and seals for them to be effective.

Audio:

This Room Seems Empty Without You from “Lost In Reflections” forthcoming 7”+LP on Fang Bomb/Release The Bats/When Skies Are Grey/iDEAL

No Words #8 from No Words (Zeromoon 2005)

Can’t Hear The Birds Singing (Inside) from “Sally Hill EP” Kning Disk 2005

Dead Letters Spell Out Dead Words performs October 4 at the Velvet Lounge.

Sponsors of Sonic Circuits